Sourcing note: Specific pricing, contract terms, and feature claims about Cvent and other named competitors below are framed structurally or sourced to public materials — Cvent.com, G2 reviews, Capterra, and corporate press releases. We do not invent competitor numbers.

Proposal Comparison Tools in RFP Software: 2026 Buyer's Guide

By Easy RFP Team · Last reviewed: 2026-05-08

TL;DR. A 2026-class proposal comparison tool supports: side-by-side view across 3+ proposals, F&B granular breakdown (banquet vs coffee break vs lunch vs dinner), total-cost normalization across currencies, scoring by weighted criteria (TOPSIS or similar), visual highlighting of best/worst values per row, and export to PDF for stakeholder review. Easy RFP supports all of these.

Why this feature decides ROI more than the builder

Quick answer (40–60 words): The builder shapes inputs. The comparison tool shapes the decision. Customers commonly report meaningful time savings on follow-up coordination and proposal formatting compared to email-based sourcing — and the comparison view is where that time-saving lives. Evaluating proposals in Excel takes hours; in a strong comparison tool, it takes minutes.

What "good" looks like in 2026

Quick answer (40–60 words): A 2026 proposal comparison view should support: side-by-side display of 3–10 proposals, granular line-items (rooms, F&B by meal type, AV, parking, taxes), currency normalization (auto-convert to a base currency), weighted-criteria scoring (TOPSIS or AHP), best/worst value highlighting per row, sticky-header table for long forms, and clean PDF export with branding for client share-out.

Easy RFP's comparison capabilities

CapabilityFreeProTeamEnterprise
Max proposals compared310UnlimitedUnlimited
F&B granular breakdown
Currency normalization
TOPSIS weighted scoring⚠️ Default weights✅ Customizable✅ + custom criteria
PDF export with branding✅ Easy RFP brand✅ Your brand✅ Your brand✅ + white-label
Audit-trail of changes
Client-shared link✅ + access control

TOPSIS scoring — what it is and why it matters

Quick answer (40–60 words): TOPSIS (Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) is a multi-criteria decision-making method that scores proposals against an "ideal" benchmark across weighted criteria (price, location, F&B quality, response time, etc.). It produces a single comparative score per proposal. It's transparent (math is published) and defensible — useful for procurement-team approvals.

We use TOPSIS because it's transparent, weight-customizable, and audit-defensible. Some buyers prefer simpler approaches (lowest-price, weighted average); we support both.

FAQ

Q: Can we customize the scoring weights? A: Yes — Team tier and Enterprise. Pro tier uses sensible defaults.

Q: Can we share comparisons with clients/stakeholders? A: Yes — share via secure link with access control, or PDF export with your branding.

Q: Does the comparison handle multi-currency? A: Yes — auto-normalizes to your base currency using ECB FX rates. Currency lock available for fixed-rate scenarios.

Q: How do you handle missing data in proposals? A: Highlighted in red with "missing" tag. Doesn't break scoring; just lowers that proposal's score on missing rows.

Sources

CTA

Try Easy RFP's comparison view free — Free tier supports up to 3 proposals.