Migrating from Tripleseat to Easy RFP: A Practical Guide
TL;DR. Tripleseat is strong for venue sales and group events at restaurants/venues. Easy RFP is built for MICE planners sourcing hotels for corporate meetings, incentives and SKOs. Migration is most often chosen by teams whose scope shifted from venue-side to planner-side, or who need multi-vendor RFP comparison rather than single-venue booking management.
When migration makes sense
Quick answer (40–60 words): Tripleseat → Easy RFP makes sense if your team's role shifted from running venue sales to running MICE sourcing across multiple hotels per event, you need vendor-neutral proposal comparison, and your scope is corporate meetings/incentives rather than restaurant/banquet bookings. Tripleseat remains excellent for venue-side sales — Easy RFP serves a different role.
Tripleseat is built for venue operators. Easy RFP is built for event planners. They genuinely serve different sides of the table. The migration story isn't "Tripleseat is bad" — it's "your role changed."
Migration mechanics (similar to Cvent flow)
- Export contacts and event history from Tripleseat
- Clean and prepare CSV
- Import into Easy RFP
- Re-create active proposals
- Train team
- Parallel-run
Timeline: 3–7 working days for typical boutique scope.
What's similar, what's different
| Capability | Tripleseat | Easy RFP |
|---|---|---|
| Single venue sales workflow | ✅ Strong | Out of scope |
| Multi-hotel RFP comparison | Out of scope | ✅ Strong |
| Restaurant/banquet management | ✅ Yes | No |
| Corporate MICE sourcing | Limited | ✅ Yes |
| Vendor-neutral proposal compare | No | ✅ Yes |
FAQ
Q: Can I use both Tripleseat and Easy RFP? A: Yes — many teams do, especially DMCs with both venue partnerships and corporate sourcing.
Q: What about Tripleseat reporting history? A: Export to CSV/PDF for archive. Easy RFP imports new structured data going forward.
Sources
- Tripleseat product documentation
- Easy RFP /docs/
CTA
If your scope shifted toward MICE sourcing, see Easy RFP pricing.