PRESS KIT · Q1 2026 · CC BY 4.0
← Full article
Easy RFP · Research
Q1 2026 · FLAGSHIP
Report no. ERFP-RTB-2026Q1
Published 2026-04-22 · 22 pages
Licence CC BY 4.0

Hotel Response Time Benchmark Q1 2026: Top 10 European Cities

First-party benchmark of corporate MICE RFP response times across 15,213 RFPs sent to 4,892 unique European hotels in Q1 2026. Press-ready summary, pull-quote, chart PNGs and embed-ready interactive leaderboard.

n=15,213 RFPs 4,892 hotels 27 markets Q1 2026 · Jan 1 – Mar 31

1. Headline numbers

38h 14m
Median first response
4d 6h
Median full quote
27.4%
Ghost rate (14d)
22h 40m
Madrid (fastest)
52h 30m
London (slowest top-10)
19%
Independent vs chain gap
200-Word Data Summary · for press use

Easy RFP's Q1 2026 European Hotel Response Time Benchmark, drawn from 15,213 corporate MICE RFPs sent to 4,892 unique hotels across 27 European markets between 1 January and 31 March 2026, finds the median first-response time at 38 hours 14 minutes and the median full-quote turnaround at 4 days 6 hours. 27.4% of RFPs received no acknowledgement within 14 days. Madrid leads the city leaderboard (22h 40min median first response), followed by Lisbon (24h 10min) and Milan (27h 50min). London is the slowest top-10 city at 52h 30min and the largest quarter-on-quarter slip (+5h 50min vs Q4 2025). Independent hotels responded 19% faster than chain-flagged properties (32h 06min vs 41h 28min) — a structural gap explained by independent revenue managers replying directly while chain enquiries route through a brand sales office or shared MICE inbox before reaching the property. Counter-intuitively, RFPs with shorter lead times (under 30 days) received faster responses than RFPs with 90+ days lead time, suggesting hotels triage by urgency rather than queue position — a behavioural bias planners can exploit using deadlined "intent to enquire" outreach. The benchmark is released under CC BY 4.0, includes an embeddable interactive City Speed Leaderboard with drill-downs by city, and will be re-issued each calendar quarter. Full data summary, methodology and the interactive leaderboard are published at easyhotelrfp.com/blog/research/hotel-response-time-benchmark-q1-2026/.

"38 hours is the median; the deselection threshold is 24. Every hour past day one halves the probability that a hotel makes the planner's final three."

— Easy RFP Editorial, Hotel Response Time Benchmark Q1 2026

Methodology, in one paragraph. Sample: 15,213 distinct corporate MICE RFPs sent through Easy RFP between 1 Jan 2026 and 31 Mar 2026, addressed to 4,892 unique hotels across 27 European markets, originated by 1,184 distinct planner accounts. First-response time = wall-clock interval from RFP send to first inbound message with substantive content (auto-replies and bounces excluded). Full-quote time = interval from send to first message containing priced rooms and meeting-space proposal. Ghost rate = share of RFPs with no inbound substantive message within 14 calendar days. All figures are medians unless noted. Replicate by contacting [email protected].

2. City Speed Leaderboard · Q1 2026

RankCityMedian 1st responseFull quoteGhost (14d)QoQ delta
1Madrid22h 40m3d 4h18.2%−3h 10m
2Lisbon24h 10m3d 6h21.6%−1h 30m
3Milan27h 50m3d 14h23.8%+0h 20m
4Barcelona29h 20m3d 18h24.1%+2h 10m
5Berlin33h 50m4d 2h26.4%−1h 40m
6Paris36h 10m4d 8h28.2%+1h 50m
7Munich37h 30m4d 12h29.7%+3h 20m
8Amsterdam41h 20m4d 20h30.5%+2h 40m
9Rome44h 50m5d 4h31.8%+4h 10m
10London52h 30m5d 22h34.2%+5h 50m

CHART 1 · Median first-response time by city · Q1 2026

n=15,213 RFPs · hours, lower is faster · benchmark line at 24h
24h deselection threshold Madrid22h 40m Lisbon24h 10m Milan27h 50m Barcelona29h 20m Berlin33h 50m Paris36h 10m Munich37h 30m Amsterdam41h 20m Rome44h 50m London52h 30m Source: Easy RFP corpus, Q1 2026 · n=15,213 RFPs · CC BY 4.0
Embed: easyhotelrfp.com/blog/research/hotel-response-time-benchmark-q1-2026/#cityLeaderboard

CHART 2 · Chain vs independent · median first-response time

Q1 2026 · paired by city · independents respond 19% faster on aggregate
Madrid Indep 19h 50m Chain 28h 15m Milan Indep 24h 35m Chain 39h 50m Berlin Indep 29h 50m Chain 42h 30m Paris Indep 31h 20m Chain 44h 40m Amsterdam Indep 36h 20m Chain 52h 10m London Indep 44h 10m Chain 63h 40m Independent Chain Source: Easy RFP corpus · Q1 2026 · CC BY 4.0
Embed: easyhotelrfp.com/blog/research/hotel-response-time-benchmark-q1-2026/#chain-vs-independent

CHART 3 · Lead time vs first-response time · the urgency paradox

Q1 2026 · hotels triage by urgency, not queue position
< 14 days14h 50m 14–29 days21h 10m 30–59 days32h 40m 60–89 days42h 50m ≥ 90 days54h 20m Source: Easy RFP corpus · Q1 2026 · n=15,213 RFPs · CC BY 4.0
Embed: easyhotelrfp.com/blog/research/hotel-response-time-benchmark-q1-2026/#lead-time

CHART 4 · QoQ movement · Q4 2025 → Q1 2026

5 cities improved, 5 slipped — slip concentrated in chain-heavy markets
0h (no change) Madrid−3h 10m Lisbon−1h 30m Milan+0h 20m Barcelona+2h 10m Berlin−1h 40m Paris+1h 50m Munich+3h 20m Amsterdam +2h 40m · Rome +4h 10m · London +5h 50m all decelerated vs Q4 2025
Embed: easyhotelrfp.com/blog/research/hotel-response-time-benchmark-q1-2026/#qoq

3. Embeddable interactive leaderboard

For trade publishers — copy-paste embed

The City Speed Leaderboard is available as an iframe embed under CC BY 4.0. Attribution required ("Easy RFP, Hotel Response Time Benchmark Q1 2026"). 600×620 default, responsive.

<iframe src="https://easyhotelrfp.com/blog/research/hotel-response-time-benchmark-q1-2026/?embed=leaderboard"
  width="100%" height="620" frameborder="0" loading="lazy"
  title="European Hotel Response Time Leaderboard · Q1 2026 · Easy RFP">
</iframe>

4. Sources cited and how this compares to public benchmarks

Where we cite a specific number from a competitor or third-party source, the number is taken from a public press release, conference presentation, public filing, or directly-published industry report. We do not cite private vendor figures and do not editorialise on competitor practices.

5. Citation and licence

Citation (AP / Reuters style):
Easy RFP. (2026). Hotel Response Time Benchmark Q1 2026: Top 10 European Cities Compared (Report no. ERFP-RTB-2026Q1). https://easyhotelrfp.com/blog/research/hotel-response-time-benchmark-q1-2026/

Citation (academic / Harvard):
Easy RFP, 2026. Hotel Response Time Benchmark Q1 2026: Top 10 European Cities Compared. [online] Easy RFP Editorial. Available at: <https://easyhotelrfp.com/blog/research/hotel-response-time-benchmark-q1-2026/> [Accessed DATE].

Licence: CC BY 4.0. Republish freely with attribution and link-back. Custom data cuts (single country, single city, segment) available on request.

Press contact
Embargo
Lifted 2026-04-22 09:00 CET
Next issue
Q2 2026 · 22 July 2026
Canonical URL